The Ghent Letters

Two letters:
an academic divide

Who signed competing open letters about Ghent University’s suspension of Nathan Cofnas—and what do their institutions, locations and academic profiles reveal?

Support Ghent’s action

Supporters

signatories

Oppose the suspension

Opponents

signatories

00 · THE LETTERS

The positions, in their own words

Read the source texts, then explore who signed each one.

Supporters

in view

Open letter supporting Ghent University’s investigation

“We want to support Ghent’s decision to start an investigation, resist the framing of this investigation as a punishment for ‘whistleblowing’…”
Read the full letter

Loading letter…

View original

Opponents

in view

Letter opposing punishment of Nathan Cofnas

“We urge Ghent University to protect Dr Cofnas from being punished for exercising his academic freedom.”
Read the full letter

Loading letter…

View original

01 · GEOGRAPHY

Two letters, different centres of gravity

Country is based on inferred affiliation location; records without a country are excluded here.

Supporters

in view

Regional split

Share of signatories

Opponents

in view

Regional split

Share of signatories

02 · AFFILIATIONS

The institutions behind the signatures

Comparing institutional concentration and breadth across the two letters.

Supporters

in view

unique universities / affiliations

Top ten affiliations

Signatories
top-ranked institutions needed to cover at least 50%

Top 10 universities account for of the total signatories

View the full affiliation list

Opponents

in view

unique universities / affiliations

Top ten affiliations

Signatories
top-ranked institutions needed to cover at least 50%

Top 10 universities account for of the total signatories

View the full affiliation list

University names were standardised using the University Domains and Names Data List. Automated matching and manual normalisation may contain errors.

03 · ACADEMIC FIELDS

Which disciplines are represented?

Broad field families, followed by comparable shares across the most common inferred disciplines.

Supporters

Broad field families

Known fields only

Detailed fields

Count · share

Opponents

Broad field families

Known fields only

Detailed fields

Count · share

04 · INFERRED GENDER

A sharply different gender balance

Pie area shows the share of signatories in each inferred gender category.

Supporters

in view

Opponents

in view

Gender categories were inferred from first names using gender-guesser. This inference may be incomplete or incorrect and does not establish a person’s gender identity.

05 · ACADEMIC RANKS

Seniority, career stage and role

Grouped career stages first, followed by detailed ranks ordered from senior to earlier-career roles.

Supporters

in view

Detailed ranks

Count · share

Opponents

in view

Detailed ranks

Count · share